David Yates / Eddie Redmayne, Katherine Waterston, Dan Fogler, Ezra Miller / Fantasy / 2016 / 12A / 133mins
Having been one of countless millions raised on the books, the films and that irresistible score, it was safe to say I was always going to enjoy the latest delve into the world of Harry Potter.
Sailing past the Statue of Liberty, magizoologist Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) arrives in New York with a suitcase full of magical creatures that prove a little too curious. Accidents occur and, naturally, it’s up to our plucky hero and his band of misfits to save the day after they get wound up in a drama that could force a terrible war between wizards and muggle-kind.
Thankfully Fantastic Beasts remains shamelessly devout to all things Potter-ish. Magic aside, there’s humour aplenty, the creatures are loveable and cute – the pesky Niffler being a favourite – and there’s a clear sense of good versus evil laced with unnerving, dark moments.
Even without JK Rowling’s venerable acclaim, Eddie Redmayne was always going to be a (dare I say it) fantastic feat of casting. He fits the bill, bringing a bumbling, unapologetic assortment of Britishness to Newt that I doubt many could achieve. He is his character, and that is always a delight to watch.
Praise runs thin for the rest. Ezra Miller and Colin Farrell were surely the other standouts, but other characters were poorly written. Enter Tina Goldstein: bizarre decision-making extraordinaire. It’s unfortunate for the hugely talented Katherine Waterston to play a character whose actions delay the film by a good half an hour.
Which leads me to my next point: although peppered with highlights, there are inconsistent flaws with the script. There are useless subplots (the political one springs to mind); the editing is so condensed that some points seem ‘jumpy’; no-maj Kowalski accepts the wizarding world with a LOL YOLO approach that’s hardly believable; the monsters’ CGI, despite interacting with their environments realistically, will be dated by the end of the decade; and there are some minor wizarding flaws I am sure fans will pick up on.
Worst of all, I was disappointed with the ending. There’s a big reveal and we’re made to forget a tragic death – it’s alarmingly forgetful and rushed.
David Yates is a timid director – just watch his last flick The Legend of Tarzan and you’ll see what I mean – but he is remarkably adept at Harry Potter films, having directed the last four. It was always a safe option to have him at the helm for this prequel spin-off.
I can’t deny it – this is a fun film and undoubtedly one of the best blockbusters of the year. It’s a loveable, endearing feature that happily expands an iconic universe. However, much like The Force Awakens, that’s also the downside – there’s a serious manipulation of nostalgia that dupes us to overlook the film’s failures.
Remember what the Harry Potter films were like? Fantastic Beasts is marginally better – nothing to be sniffed at. Cue fanfare but heed the warning: this is purely a decent film carried heavily by Eddie Redmayne with a sprinkling of cute CGI.
Film as a Film – 2 / Target Audience – 4 / General Audience – 4
PS. Johnny Depp’s makeup artist… wtf m8
Fantastic Beasts is in cinemas now
For more information about the rating system, click here.
By Source, fair use via Wikipedia.
The poster art copyright is believed to belong to the distributor of the film, the publisher of the film or the graphic artist.